Friday, May 15, 2026

ALERT: KNOWLEDGE: Adams and Cox were pushing AI 5 months ago

 LOOK HOW LONG STRATOS PLANNING WAS SECRET!

Stratos data center and gas-guzzling power plant Project has provided almost no technical information, no proof of a military benefit, no tenants, aspirational goals but no proof of benefits.

Rushing a destructive power plant and data center is a recipe for disaster







 

A high level meeting in Brigham City seemed to spill the plans in mid November, 2025.

Nov 17, 2025

Brigham City Mayor DJ Bott and Gov. Spencer Cox have announced a nuclear power plant to be built in Brigham City. Subscribe to ABC4 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/abc4utah...

Transcript:

58 seconds

We're at a crossroads in a new global environment where both AI and energy are and will continue to be weaponized.


Stuart Adams said: 1:09

1 minute, 9 seconds
The country that controls AI will control the world both economically because people are going to demand high-tech products and militarily
1 minute, 18 seconds
because we know all the weapon systems in the future will be driven by AI. They say boosting power production will help the country beat Russia and China in
1 minute, 26 seconds
that race and it will also improve the lives of those who live here.



Cox spoke after .24


1:091 minute, 9 secondsThe country that controls AI will control the world both economically because people are going to demand high-tech products and militarily 1:181 minute, 18 secondsbecause we know all the weapon systems in the future will be driven by AI. They say boosting power production will help the country beat Russia and China in 1:261 minute, 26 secondsthat race and it will also improve the lives of those who live here.

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

KNOWLEDGE: RIVER projects in Logan Utah, and its impact on Cache Valley

 ALERT and update!!!!

The Public can finally review and comment on the LOGAN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT (after 18 months of dead silence).

PLEASE comment on DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement. Information is here.


Check carefully that our community's interests are protected.




Moms and kids enjoying the Little Logan River in a threatened section of the Little Logan River. 
Merlin Olsen Park (above) to the Fairgrounds are apparently not being treated like a river that required protection by the State Engineer.



Let the sponsors of the project know your views:

Protests and comments on the Logan River Watershed Project Draft Plan-EIS can be submitted from May 8 to June 22, 2026, by mailing the USDA-NRCS or emailing ammon.boswell@usda.gov. Include "Logan River Draft Plan-EIS Comment" in the subject line to ensure your concerns regarding water flow, environmental impact, or property are documented."
but it first appeared late on May 11.

EVIDENCE:
ABOVE:  Screenshot of the Web page that posted the Draft EIS proposal.  It was updated on May 11th when the DEIS was posted.

That web site falsely reports a May 8th posting. 

The public is owed extra day to file our reactions to this plan.



 The email announcement of it posting were ever more tardy. 
That occurred May 11 at 5:01 pm.  Effectively, the document was live on May 12th. 

  

Families using the Little Logan River for recreation


A public meeting is planned on May 20th, 6-8 pm auditorium of Logan High School.

Hopefully this meeting will be recorded and posted.

(The prior October 2025 meeting was not recorded or posted)


Please advocate for:
  • year round water, (NOT INCLUDED)
  • at least 10 cfs of summer flow (so most kids can continue to go tubing), (NOT INCLUDED)
  • no new structures placed in the river bed. (TBD)




Watering lawns with water from our river is unwise in this time of rising temps and mega-drought.

Watch for DRAFT EIS on the web site.

Time is short.

Ask for advice at WethePeopleCV@gmail.com


https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/state-offices/utah/logan-river-watershed-project


Let’s preserve and enhance our priceless amenity:

The Little Logan River

OR

"Treating a cat like a dog won't makes it bark

Dr. Susanne Janecke, Sept 16, 2025





Summary comments about the LOGAN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT.  

This public works project has laudable goals to update outdated irrigation infrastructure of several canals that divert water north from the Little Logan River. 

Published plans for this project also UNNECESSARILY and very negatively dewater and mismanage the magnificent Little Logan River in our midst, in violation of Utah river law 73-3-29 

Logan, Utah, the Island, the Great Salt Lake, and east Cache Valley area between Hyde Park and the Logan River will all SUFFER from a project. It plans to divert almost all the Little Logan River's water upstream of legal diversion points into pressurized pipes. It also seeks new users that use EXTRA river water to water their lawns, while our beautiful river and the Great Salt Lake dry up.

The Logan River Watershed Project 
must do more to:
+ACTUALLY and FULLY honor the public's rights, 
+preserve rivers and landscapes, 
enhance our fabulous greenbelt of parks, 
+maintain sufficient open flow (>>8 cfs) of natural river water,
+restore winter river water to Logan, Utah’s rivers and Island area,

+and lease unused water rights to help prevent further collapse
of the Great Salt lake and Utah's economy.

KEY POINT:  THE LITTLE LOGAN RIVER IS A NATURAL RIVER--AND THIS EASILY PROVABLE FACT ENTITLES THE PUBLIC TO PROTECTIONS

There is overwhelming evidence that the Little Logan River is a natural river along its entire length.

See the FAQ in this post to see a summary of the evidence that experts use to prove that the river is a river along its entire length.

Problem statement:

The Little Logan River is a natural river, not a man-made canal. Plans to upgrade the canals that are fed by the river will degrade the Little Logan River unless its river status is protected, as required by law since the early 1970s. 

River status gives Little Logan River extra protection. Unfortunately, sponsors of Logan River Watershed Project appear to be planning and managing the Little Logan River as if it were a man-canal that can be modified at will.

A win-win solution is possible with ZERO impact on the water provided to existing or potential water users.  The excess unused water right (~ 45-55 cfs) could keep the Little Logan River healthy and satisfy the law. 


Key to this win-win solution is the fact that the Crockett Canal companies have rights to 140 cfs of river water at peak flows but there have been no users for more than 85 cfs in at least two decades. Records dating back to the 1970s show that the full allotment was NEVER in the Little Logan River on its way to canals. Peak flows have been below 100 cfs since 1997 and below 120 cfs since about 1987.


The large excess right is not being shared with the public that owns the water.

The Logan River Watershed Project is motivated by a desire to spend tax moneys (~135 million dollars) to find new users of the unused water right. 


With FAR TOO FEW USERS of the Crockett water rights, it is remarkable and noteworthy that the sponsors propose an extremely stingy amount of water for the Little Logan River.  


They propose that ZERO water flows in the Little Logan River during droughts and a maximum of 10 cfs during unspecified conditions. 



Grinches all!

TLTLTLTLTLTLTL

Sponsors have erroneously claimed that most of the Little Logan River is a canal. This claim is critical for sponsors to perpetrate the alarming degradation planned, with limited transparency, to our incredible river. (Many updates since October 2024 have not been shared with the public)

The last updated version of the Logan River Watershed Project does not treat the Little Logan river as a river, with required legal protections. It appears that sponsors have barely considered the law or the public’s rights in their planning.


Yet the public was assured REPEATEDLY that the plan for upgrading infrastructure does not damage the Little Logan River. Sadly those assurances never matched with posted documents later posted to describe the project, nor with checks of other facts.  


The Little Logan river will not be healthy unless it has enough water to sustain its current uses, including very popular water sports by families, cooling, environmental functions and fish begin to return to this river. 10-15 cfs guaranteed in the summer along the entire river would accomplish this public benefit. 


The published plan for the Little Logan River promises to limit water flows in the Little Logan River to a very low and worrisome range of ZERO to TEN cfs. 


Sponsors have told us that they are not legally permitted to allow water to continue to flow in the river bed after the irrigation season ends in October.


The assertion/myth/speculation/ of the river being a canal was seemingly never tested against the legal, geologic, regulatory or historic evidence. 


TLTLTLTLTLTLT

 All rivers have additional protections that canals do not have (Utah code 73-3-29).  That law requires that there must be a balance of water rights and the public's rights to recreation, a healthy environment and aquatic species.  

The public rights to a healthy natural river would be well-served if adults were able to tube in the river without going aground (~15 cfs flowing) and winter desiccation ends so that fish can reestablish.  


 Qr code helps you to share the report


By Dr. Susanne Janecke

Updated July 2025

Return to this information portal

Tinyurl.com/savellr 

Tinyurl.com/RESTORELLR


SKIP AHEAD TO A POWERPOINT TALK (5 minutes) about the Little Logan river's precarious future (use find "talk"). 

Monday, May 11, 2026

ACTION: Oppose the Stratos Project: Sign an open letter to Governor Cox, Senator Adams and Speaker Schultz by Wed night

 WHAT CAN I DO NOW?

  • Sign this letter to Gov. Cox, Speaker Shultz, and President Adams opposing the Stratos Project

    • tinyurl.com/stratosproject

    • Deadline for signing this letter is EARLY MORNING May 14th

    • PLEASE join thousands of Utahns and sign this open letter

    • Please share this with your friends

    • This may not help put it keeps up the pressure on our unscrupulous lawmakers

    • Letter will be presented at 10:30 rally May 14th at Utah Capital. 

    • Find out more about the rally on instagram.


ARTIST


The key request in the letter is this:

You and President Adams have the authority to require MIDA pause this process pending independent review. We are asking you to use it.

There is no obligation to approve this project without independent review. No statute requires Utah to approve a 9-gigawatt data center in three weeks with no water study and no public comment. What Utah does have an obligation to do, in your own words, is save the Great Salt Lake. Require the independent water analysis. Require the genuine public process. That is what an obligation to the Great Salt Lake actually looks like.

Respectfully submitted,


Grow the Flow shared this link



Utah's economy and environment will suffer if Stratos Data Center is built

 Collected impacts of Stratos project exposed-a random collection

Explore more information at https://tinyurl.com/STOPUTDataCenterCORRUPTION 
Thank you creator of this infographic. Weber County Women's Caucus

Data centers AND gas-powered power plants use a LOT of water.  Yet: 
Utah's water situation is in crisis.  We are in severe to extreme drought across the entire state.



Roughly 2000 Utahns came to have their voices heard in opposition to the Stratos Project.  their leaders disrespected them, threatened to have them arrested, and then fled their own public meeting.



Desiccated lakes look like this.  IT is grim.





















The bottom line.  Utah's GOP leadership hatched the project plan before they shopped it around and asked O'Leary to lead it.

Cox, Adams, Stevenson, and many others in the Utah legislature assumed that you and I would roll over to yet another scam that harms the state, steals our tax money for the SOLE benefit of insiders.








Thank you to the creator of this graphic.







Utah's GOP LEADERSHIP is steeped in corruption and fraud: Stratos reveals a pattern of self-dealing

 Stratos Project in a nutshell:

SOURCE: centers https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/opinion/columns/pro-con-moratorium-needed-to-pause-the-attack-of-data-centers


Summary: Public statements by Stratos boosters are:

  • aspirational boasts,

  • magical thinking,

  • unscientific,

  • physics-defying claims,

  • engineering “misunderstandings”,

  • in conflicts with prior claims and documents,

  • and mostly a lot of down-right lies.


  • Promises of economic benefits appear to be very overblown when one considers the CONSIDERABLE experience of other communities.


  • Very little actual insight or technical planning appears to support the wild claims and propaganda being pushed by boosters. 

  • Check the information HERE-the last update was on April 30th.

     

Explore more information at 


Sign an open letter opposing the Stratos project here:  

There deadline EARLY MORNING of  May 14th, Thursday.




Military LAND in the Stratos project area appear to be a ruse:

A later updated map MAY include a tiny smidge of land about 45 miles to the south.

Stratos Project was reported to be entirely north of the Great Salt Lake.....

Until the press and or public dug into the false-claim of military land being in the project area. 

At that point, it appears, the smidge of Utah Trust land and maybe military land (????) ~45 miles away was hastily added.  

Kevin O'Leary exposes that Utah Leader came to him with this outrageous plan about 5 months ago.  That was roughly in November of 2025. 



Negative impacts of the Stratos Project on Utah and our region are so enormous that no infographic can capture them all.  Here is one attempt:

Weber County Women's Caucus shared this and maybe created the infographic.  Let us know the creator if this is incorrect.



This definitive web site exposes true facts

 and information through April 30, 2026.  CLICK THROUGH OTHER MENUS to see the money trail, the questions that remain unanswered, and much more.



The single (not really public) meeting about MIDA was on April 24th, 2026.  A recording of the meeting reveals almost no technical insights, zero environmental discussions and PLENTY OF SELF-CONGRATULATORY DISCUSSION ABOUT HOOD-WINKING THE UTAH PUBLIC. 




Here is the recorded meeting.  Start at about minute 30.

They claimed that military land was in the footprint to the Stratos Project.

See the official release of information here:



The Salt Lake Tribune's editorial board explains the problem extremely well:

"Even if the data center isn’t as dreadful as feared — or if it never is actually built — the stench attached to the rushed and secret political process will take a very long time to dissipate. If it ever does."


We completely agree.



Utah's GOP leadership must be voted out of office.