Saturday, June 13, 2026

Knowledge: RECORDING of MEETING & Opposition comments by every person who spoke:

 OUR* RECORDING of a Public meeting about the Logan River Watershed Project
May 20, 2026
Construction and impact in Cache Valley resulting from the Logan River Watershed Project. Figure 1.
NOTE:  RED lines are large drain pipes to prevent stormwater-flooding in North Logan area. These are 8.4 miles long, are unlikely to be pressurized, and represent ~7% of the piping. 
Purple lines are pressurized water lines in support of more residential irrigation using water rights and river water. Those are 93% of the piping.  Most other construction expenses and infrastructure support irrigation.

Why does 7% of the piping result in 55% of the expense being charged as flood prevention?


*This recording was made by members of the public in order to inform the community.  Sponsors stopped recording and posting their public meetings in 2024.

(PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO REVIEW the recording AND unanimous public opposition to the project from the 15 citizens who were allowed to speak)


A VIDEO recording of the sponsors explaining selected aspects of the Logan River Watershed Project is at this link


MUCH vital information was omitted from the presentation and some information provided is not accurate.  See other blog posts about the LRWP


Does the project leave the Little Logan situation "unchanged" as Zan Murray said at about ?  NO.

Zan Murray, lead engineer, proclaimed on May 20th in a public information meeting “the Little Logan [RIVER] situation is unchanged”. 


His CLAIM IS NOT TRUE. 

  1. Since most of the Little Logan River will be bone dry during significant parts of one in four, maybe one in three summers, the Little Logan River would be damaged by the LRWP.