Showing posts sorted by date for query "little logan river". Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query "little logan river". Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, July 5, 2026

ALERT: A list of excellent action items

 Great Salt Lake InterFaith Alliance has great information and action items

Aerial view of nearly gone Great Salt Lake from Deseret News interview highlighted here
https://www.wethepeoplecv.org/2026/07/knowledge-great-salt-lake-collapse-is.html 


NOTES: GSL Interfaith Action (GSLIA) - monthly meeting - Wednesday, July 17:00 – 8:30pm

If you have changes or additions to the minutes, or thoughts on the topics, please let us know.

We appreciate your input!

Becky Burrage and Joan Gregory


1. Attendees - Micah Mahaney(Mt Olympus Presbyterian), Mike Maxwell (LDS Earth Stewardship), Becky Burrage (Holladay United Church of Christ), Joan Gregory (First Unitarian Church of SLC), Helene (Wasatch Minyan), Susanne – Cache Valley Unitarian Universalist Fellowship, Logan; Patrick Belmont (Water scientist, Candidate for Utah State Legislature to represent Logan and Richmond, District 3); Rebecca Hunt (Unity Church)


2. Update on the opposition movement to the proposed DHS Immigration Facility next to Great Salt Lake (with negative environmental outcomes likely)
Please read and consider signing this the Utah Values Coalition's Statement of Utah Values – Protecting Our Community from Harmful Detention Centers. https://www.utahvaluescoalition.org

  • List of faith-based communities and faith leaders who have signed on:  https://www.utahvaluescoalition.org/about-us  and Community based organizations

  • Letters from faith leaders are highlighted:  https://www.utahvaluescoalition.org/letters 

  • You may ask:   Wasn't there just a NYTimes article saying:  ICE Spent $700 Million on 7 Warehouses. Now It Wants to Get Rid of Them. (Gift Article) 

  • Yes, that is positive news worth celebrating and we are hopeful that this detention center will revert back to warehouse/industrial use. However, until we know that it is not being sold to a private prison contractor, and no other detention center is being planned, we are proceeding with active opposition. Our aim is to protect our vulnerable neighbors and friends for as long as DHS/ICE continues its operations.

  • Who is the Utah Values Coalition?    We are members of the Salt Lake community and we are Utahns who are coming together to say:  we have values here in Utah.  What is happening by locating an ICE Warehouse Detention Center here goes totally against our Utah values.  Those values were the basis of the Utah Compact for Immigration, signed in 2010 and reaffirmed in 2019, which committed Utah's leaders to a set of principles rooted in humanity, fiscal responsibility, the rule of law, and the well-being of families and communities. Those principles did not expire. They are the Utah Way. 

  • We are dedicated to uniting voices across Utah to oppose the proposed mega warehouse ICE detention facility.  Our mission is to protect our communities and advocate for humane alternatives that reflect our shared values of compassion and justice.

  • If you agree, you too can be part of this Coalition by signing onto this statement: https://www.utahvaluescoalition.org/   You may sign on as an individual Utahn, or you may sign on as a Utah faith-based community, community-based organization, or business.  Feel free to use this QR code and flyer and this email if you would like to share this sign-on opportunity with others.

  • We look forward to seeing you join this effort.  Once we have a significant number of signatures, we plan to deliver this statement as a letter to Utah Governor Cox and to other Utah elected officials and leaders in our Utah communities.

  • Questions: utahvaluescoalition@gmail.com - Joan M. Gregory, Convener, Utah Values Coalition

  • Flyers that you can use to share this action with your congregation:  https://tinyurl.com/UVC-QRCodeFlyer 


3. Update on the Tooele data center next to GSL.

  • A Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA) backed industrial development in Tooele Valley, enabled by more than $240 million in taxpayer-backed infrastructure financing, has applied for a state permit to discharge concentrated brine from a reverse osmosis water treatment plant into wetlands just 1.6 miles from Great Salt Lake. The discharge would flow directly into Gilbert Bay with no enforceable limits on salt, chloride, or arsenic.

  • Website for background information from Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment: https://www.uphe.org/2026/06/16/help-stop-another-data-center-proposal-tooele/   

  • The comment deadline is July 8. Submitting a comment is straightforward, and every comment matters. Here’s what to do: Send an email to wqcomments@utah.gov   Use “Permit UT0026409” as your subject line. In your comment, tell the Division of Water Quality why this permit should not be approved as written, cite the lack of limits on harmful pollutants, the threat to wetlands and Great Salt Lake, and the failure to account for cumulative water impacts in an already over-stressed basin.  

  • More resources if you want to dive deep into this:
    -- Listen to Dr. Brian Moench's description of the situation & instructions: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/skdq7r7lzPs   
    -- The Wrong Place for a Data Center – this is a guide on how taxpayer subsidies are funding industrial development on the edge of Great Salt Lake – Comment Period Open NOW, Closes July 8th.
    -- Laws that Hand Utah to Corporations – kiWhat MIDA and UIPA Do – And Why they MUST be Repealed:  background information about MIDA and UIPA 

-- Tooele Inland Ports: A Data Center on the Shore of Great Salt Lake

-- Patrick Belmont (Logan) - published a piece in Deseret News on the BE data center: https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2026/05/09/the-issue-is-bigger-than-the-data-center/
Many of those same points will likely apply to Tooele.


-- Still hoping to get the faith-based community to speak out at any of these press conferences.  The more we can show more diversity in advocacy, the better.   Mike made the point that more centrist and conservative leaning folks need to be attracted to speak out about the issues 

-- Maybe something we in GSLIA could do here on Pioneer Day?


4.  Discussion about distributing our water conservation flyer and GSLIA information. 

 A Practical Guide to using Less Water for the Benefit of GSL: Outdoor water Stewardship for Faith Communities. See the attachments for the half-page and full-page flyer versions (print-at-home) and the document itself.


5. How to be involved with the August Legislative Interim Session.   https://growtheflowutah.org/legislative-outreach/   Also:  https://le.utah.gov/    Interesting:  https://le.utah.gov/interim/2026/InterimSchedule.pdf  <- Notice the schedule of national conferences that this Interim schedule highlights, in particular The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), July 22-24, 2026. This year’s conference aligns with the States 250 initiative, focusing on state-level policies and America250.  Often when you hear that a bill is being introduced in legislatures across the country, it is an ALEC bill.  Their tag line is:  Limited Government • Free Markets • Federalism.   


7. Discussion about organizing another Our Sacred Lake event at The Cathedral of the Madeleine.  Is this something we want to do again?   In the past we have done 3 different events there.  Greg asked about an annual event – OK if not as intensive amount of work.   How do we get the message of OUR SACRED GREAT SALT LAKE across.  We have shown films, done it at the Cathedral.  What could we do that would be interesting, touch their hearts, let them realize that the lake is sacred and we need to be stewards of it.   

- Mike said Clive Romney has new GSL music he offered to share at an event. (see suggested videos under Announcements).

- Michah: Considering the reverence – representatives from many of the tribes or ceremonial dance.   Last year – we had Carl Moore – prayer to the 4 directions.  This is a video of last year’s event:

               

8. Announcements/volunteering opportunities and events
https://growtheflowutah.org/events/

Films available (per Helene):

-   "The Lake," originally premiered at Sundance this past February, will be screened on July 18 at 7:00 pm in SLC at Utah Film Center (Broadway Theater) and on July 19 at 1:00 pm in the Jim Santy Auditorium in the Park City Library.

-  "Secrets of Great Salt Lake," is being shown at Antelope Island Visitor center in its new theatre.  Not open to the public yet but  Osher Lifelong Learning Institute, on July 16 is sponsoring a lecture at 10:00 am followed by the film screening at 10:30 am.   It is free, but registration with Osher is required.  

(There is a form to fill out on  the Antelope Island website if you would like to reserve a time to show the film to "your group.")


Susanne is interested in obtaining "The Lake" to show in Logan:  suggested contacting Jake Dreyfous at Grow the Flow for assistance with that.  jake@growtheflowutah.org

9. Leasing unused water-rights in Logan – Susanne said  they have not pushed on the GSL issue before, but now it has become a local Logan issue – many more people interested in getting involved for GSL – add the article in our minutes – things that pertain to their issue – comment on draft environmental impact statement – articles and publicity – urge to withdraw this whole plan .  We will post ways to become involved in this issue on this website when we learn of opportunities.

https://www.wethepeoplecv.org/2026/06/knowledge-what-does-logan-river.html  - https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/06/18/cache-valleys-little-logan-river/



Friday, July 3, 2026

Knowledge: HOW DO WE KNOW THAT THE LITTLE LOGAN RIVER IS A Protected RIVER, AND NOT A CANAL AS SPONSORS OF Logan River Watershed Project USUALLY CLAIM?


HOW DO WE KNOW THAT THE LITTLE LOGAN RIVER IS A Protected RIVER, AND NOT A CANAL AS SPONSORS OF Logan River Watershed Project USUALLY CLAIM?

Return to this blog post: Tinyurl.com/LLRISARIVERBLG

The public's rights to a healthy, year-round Little Logan River are being violated

Find out more here::

Tinyurl.com/RESTORELLR 


-Rivers are protected by Utah law yet the public's rights to a healthy, year-round Little Logan River are being violated by the owner of the river, Logan City and by Canal companies.   


-Implementing the Logan River Watershed Project would worsen this situation significantly, unless it is modified to honor the public's rights in Utah law 73-3-29.


A Win-Win is possible if water rights holder would permit ~ 20% (~10-15 cfs, which is enough water for most kids to go tubing in the river) of their recent unneeded/unused water right to flow naturally along the Little Logan River instead!


SECTIONS below:

  1. Experts ARE amazed that there is a debate about the Little Logan River's status-it is river. Quick summary of evidence for the river status of the Little Logan River. Evidence was culled down to the main points.


  1. Explanation why a river is protected, and the public’s rights to recreation, environment and aquatic species must be protected. This right has been violated for decades during winter dessication.


  1. Detailed expanded evidence and analysis showing that the Little Logan River in indisputably a natural river and has not lost that status. There are > 30 types of evidence and arguments. You may wish to consult additional legal and historic documents for supporting facts (more information too).


  1. RETURN HERE. Please SHARE widely using the Qr code and Tinyurl.com/LLRISARIVERBLG.



CURRENT ACTION ITEM:

PLS CONTACT DECISION MAKERS

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Knowledge: Little Logan River, Letters to Editor compiled

Letters to the editors about the Little Logan River,

negative aspects of the Logan River Watershed Project

Lucy Watkins created this quilt and gave us permission to use it to protect the Little Logan River from canal companies.

LATEST ADDITION:  LETTER: PROTECT THE LITTLE LOGAN RIVER WITHOUT SPENDING $!) MILLION DOLLARS


LETTER: Little Logan River needs to be saved

LETTER: Don't Destroy the Little Logan River | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: Don’t Ignore What the Logan River Means to Cache Valley | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: Don't Bury a River That Predates Our Cities | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: Some Little Logan River Facts, Not Fear: An Open Letter to John Shivik | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: A Reality Check on the Little Logan River | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

 LETTER: Save the Little Logan River with a Public Comment by Monday! | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: Let's Debate the Little Logan With Facts, Not Fear | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

​​LETTER: Leave the Little Logan River Alone | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

 ​LETTER: Save the Little Logan River with a Public Comment by Monday! | Opinion | cachevalleydaily.com

LETTER: Little Logan River needs to be saved

Letter: Little Logan River's fate shouldn't be up to engineers | Letters to the Editor | hjnews.com 



Dear Editor:

Engineers design for efficiency. Bureaucrats and politicians ensure the sustainability and power of the bureaucracy. Developers are enriched by development. None of these endeavors ensure the beauty, goodness and delight of community

Among other attributes, the liveability of a community rests upon its beauty. Neither engineers, politicians, nor developers have ever created the beauty, wonder and natural goodness of a free-flowing brook such as the Little Logan River. They now propose to cover over and dry up this very same artery of life that connects and enriches our community and landscape.. Citizens, please think twice before we allow these "public servants" to disappear yet another thread of the natural, living fabric that once made our town, Logan, Utah, a quaint, unique and beautiful home.

Kayo Robertson

Letter: Save the Little Logan River | | hjnews.com


Letter: Save the Little Logan River



Apr 18, 2024

The life or death of the historic Little Logan River should not have been put in the hands of an engineering firm.

The affected Island residents have been denied adequate public voice. No one knew that Logan’s history, river and resources, for decades, was being consigned to asphalt.

We thought the governing body of Logan was the City Council; not an engineering firm from Kaysville. We thought as taxpayers and property owners such a monumental decision would be a matter of public discussion and accessible public record.

This situation needs to be rolled back to square one. Radio and media need to broadcast loudly the opportunity to address this unwise decision.

Compared to Salt Lake City, we are not on the same page when it comes to people denied public comments at the Logan City Council meeting. Representatives of the engineering firm outlined and apparently already approved plan. Salt Lake City allows public input on affected neighborhood issues. This would appear as a done deal to us.

Boise, Idaho treasures greenbelt and river side property.

Little Logan River is the “River Runs Through It.” Its beauty and charm contribute to the uniqueness of Logan. Trees give shelter to birds and ducks are inhabitants of the river. Environmentally it is a crime to destroy and obliterate this branch of the Logan River. The trees will likely die as well.

When all property owners have not agreed on giving up the river border on their title, how can alternatives be addressed?

Charlie McCullom (former Herald Journal editor) once wrote an article on our “River Runs Through It.” He alluded to the Little Logan River running through Merlin Olsen Park. He observed the joyous children splashing in the river at the park. Families had picnics nearby. He enjoyed that timeless treasure of community life. If you would like to save the Little Logan River and its trees, birds and fish, send e-mails to Mayor Holly Daines at Holly.Daines@loganutah.org and also city councilmember Jeannie Simmonds.

Help save the Historic Heart and soul of Logan!

Janice Bird



Logan

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Knowledge: Critics of the Logan River Watershed Project speak

 

Critics of the Logan River Watershed Project have a chance to speak


ACCESS Utah's Tom Williams interviewed 4 critics during the June 22, 2026 program

Access Utah explores relevant community, political, and cultural topics impacting Utah residents.

********************************************************************

Award winning host Tom Williams interviewed 4 members of the steering committee of the Two River's coalition.

HEAR the interview HERE

"A major canal project proposed in Logan would divert water from First Dam to flow to residents in Logan, North Logan, and Hyde Park.

Proponents of the project say that the current system isn’t efficient enough in getting water to those towns. Critics are worried that diverting this water would diminish the Little Logan River, and that it would be better to let the water flow on to the Bear River and ultimately the Great Salt Lake. Today we speak with critics of the project: Susanne Janecke, Andy Keller, Alana Nafziger, and Beth Booton."

********************************************************************

What is going on with the cost of flood control?

How can 7% of the infrastructure cost 55% of the budget?

The red pipelines prevent flooding and those are 8.4 miles long.
The purple pipelines disperse irrigation water in the community along 116 miles. support irrigation. Other infrastructure makes pressurized irrigation possible.


Herald Journal article about the RiverFEST and LRWP.


Malory Rau, staff writer. Eli Lucero photographer

Musicians play in the Little Logan River during RiverFEST.  Thank you everyone!

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Thank you EVERYONE: RiverFEST, newspaper articles, Access Utah, and letters in support of maintaining a healthy Little Logan River

 Cache Valley rose up in support of our Little Logan River


Thank you

First Annual RiverFEST was a success

Wilson Neighborhood leadership team were helpful.  Thank you.

The Salt Lake Tribune noticed our Little Logan River too.



Photograph of the Little Logan River from the excellent article by local journalist Brock Marchant  and Naomi Cragun.  
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/06/18/cache-valleys-little-logan-river/ 

The headline says it all

"A plan to keep northern Utah lawns green could drastically cut flows in a river that feeds the Great Salt Lake

The president of the irrigation company backing the project said people should have a choice in what water they use to keep their lawns going."

CLICK HERE:


Salt Lake Tribune is now a free newspaper.  If you can afford it, please support their excellent journalism.

Remember: Taxpayers do not have the choice to have our $310 millions of dollars used to install this project.  We have no choice about the annual $2 millions in operating expenses either.

********************************************************************

Musicians, neighbors, activists, and regular folks all came to show our love for the Little Logan River in Merlin Olsen Park 

during our first 

ANNUAL RiverFEST

Elaine Wilcox organized the Little Logan RiverFest.
Thank you also to her many excellent helpers.

Reminder:  The Little Logan River was year round in early 1990s in 300-400 E block.  Wilcox family photo.

Little Logan River will lose 80-100% of its river water if the Logan River Watershed Project is implemented. Logan High students will not be able to soak in the chilly waters after sporting events in the Logan High section (under the word "most").  Adults will not able enjoying flows as high as 85 cfs in Jens Johansen and River Hollow Park section (middle arrow).  More than a mile of the Logan River between the Island and First Dam reservoir will have a lot less water because diversion will move to First Dam from their current legal diversion points at about 300 west and 950 east. 

Saturday, June 13, 2026

Knowledge: RECORDING of MEETING & Opposition comments by every person who spoke:

 OUR* RECORDING of a Public meeting about the Logan River Watershed Project
May 20, 2026
Construction and impact in Cache Valley resulting from the Logan River Watershed Project. Figure 1.
NOTE:  RED lines are large drain pipes to prevent stormwater-flooding in North Logan area. These are 8.4 miles long, are unlikely to be pressurized, and represent ~7% of the piping. 
Purple lines are pressurized water lines in support of more residential irrigation using water rights and river water. Those are 93% of the piping.  Most other construction expenses and infrastructure support irrigation.

Why does 7% of the piping result in 55% of the expense being charged as flood prevention?


*This recording was made by members of the public in order to inform the community.  Sponsors stopped recording and posting their public meetings in 2024.

(PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO REVIEW the recording AND unanimous public opposition to the project from the 15 citizens who were allowed to speak)


A VIDEO recording of the sponsors explaining selected aspects of the Logan River Watershed Project is at this link


MUCH vital information was omitted from the presentation and some information provided is not accurate.  See other blog posts about the LRWP


Does the project leave the Little Logan situation "unchanged" as Zan Murray said at about ?  NO.

Zan Murray, lead engineer, proclaimed on May 20th in a public information meeting “the Little Logan [RIVER] situation is unchanged”. 


His CLAIM IS NOT TRUE. 

  1. Since most of the Little Logan River will be bone dry during significant parts of one in four, maybe one in three summers, the Little Logan River would be damaged by the LRWP. 

Friday, June 12, 2026

Knowledge: Sample letters to oppose the Logan River Watershed Project

 

Tinyurl.com./RESTORELLR
Click through the green button

CLICK FOR MANY SUGGESTIONS about what you can say in your email to oppose the project. HERE



https://tinyurl.com/LetterLRWP 


Red is our commentary:

The LRWP asks for an ENORMOUS subsidy from taxpayers to

“protect unused and unneeded water rights”

  • by encouraging many more homeowners to irrigate A LOT

MORE.

  • That produces little-used, often over-watered turf.

  • The Great Salt Lake needs this water desperately.

  • The project will diminish summer water in the Little Logan River in a dozen public

greenspaces to zero or a trickle,

  • unless a miracle happens and our mega-drought droughts end.

Project Description from USDA web site

The Project proposes the following improvements to address agricultural water management, flood prevention, and public recreation (RED ARE comments on the plan): 

  • Reconstruct the Crockett Diversion [Few of the VITAL details are include in the main Draft Environmental IMPACT Statement about this. Instead we had to dig deep into the 2803 long document to discover that the plan would USE OUR hundreds of MILLIONS OF TAX DOLLARS TO legally turn our Little Logan River into a canal, to ignore our severe mega-drought, and to spend excessive public funds.  
  • There is a grave concerns that undisclosed in the plan is an engineering design that will disconnect the Little Logan River from its source forever --thereby converting our Little Logan River into a high and dry ditch that depends on the "largess" of "management" for flow of any water.  That water might even be fish-free piped water delivered from a "pressurized pipe".]
  • Install irrigation connection to First Dam.
  • Construct downstream water storage with pump stations 
  • Install new pressurized irrigation systems [This is the most expansive, expensive, and most disruptive part of the plan that consumes most of the funding, report and impact. Oddly, stormwater flood prevention is listed as being 30 million dollar more expensive than the pressurized irrigation system which will mostly install one large pipe along 8.4 miles, and fill dry canals with water
  • The public is not clearly informed about the costs of using this pressurized irrigation systems.  
  • It will charge EVERYONE in the three cities at least $84 per year.  
  • There is a large one time cost of converting.  Shareholders who use flood irrigation will need to install a very expensive new irrigation system on their residential property or figure out how to avoid erosion with the pressurized system if they wish to fully benefit from the new irrigation method. 
  • We estimate that a modest lot will be required to spend $5-10,000 converting to a pressurized irrigation system.  
  • Sponsors showed a schematic sketch that assumes the price of culinary water will exceed the cost of secondary water in the future.  One opponent of the project was insulted by this sketch.  We are too.
  • 120 miles of street will be torn up. 
  • What will be irrigated?  
  • Utah data show it will be mostly excess turf.
  • Since the Great Salt Lake is vital to the state's health and economy, the cost of its inflowing river water should become much more expensive instead.]
  • Improve existing canals 
    • [How?  The public has no clarity about the plans for the open canals on or near their properties. Which canals will become dry open ditches and which will become buried pipes?  Which canals risk having algae growing in them like the West Highline canal does now.  
    • The West Highline canal is so choked by algae that it is visible for 2 miles on aerial photographs.
  • Construct recreational trails 
[Recreation in our community will mostly be set back by the damage to the Little Logan River in ~13 public green spaces along it.

 

Tubing and swimming will be limited to small children.  During hot dry summers a ribbon of algae, with some of it being toxic, could develop.
 
Adding ~3400 ft of trails is a trivial addition to the extensive trail system of Logan, Utah. The longer trail in Logan Bluff is redundant of three other walkways that already exist between 600 E and 200 East.  Neither trail is wanted by the community.  See the survey results pertaining to the Canyon road trail project: 60% of respondents do not want more trail along Canyon Road]


CLICK FOR MANY SUGGESTIONS about what you can say in your email to oppose the project. HERE

 


RETURN to landing page about LRWP and Little Logan River